Matter of Welfare of C. Children
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PARKER, Judge.
This appeal arises from an order of the Pipestone County Court following a court trial, finding the C. children neglected under Minn.Stat. § 260.015, subd. 10(b), (e) (1982). The parents contend that (1) the evidence was insufficient to support the court’s finding; (2) evidence was improperly excluded; (3) evidence tainted by an unconstitutional search and seizure was improperly admitted; (4) their right to counsel was violated; and (5) the disposition was an abuse of discretion. We affirm the portion of the court’s orders finding the four children, M.C.C., C.L.C., J.S.C.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Jenson v. Touche Ross & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Rosenfeld v. RosenfeldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Evans v. BlesiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- In Re Welfare of IQSSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- DB v. State, Department of Family ServicesWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
- In Re Interest of Borius H.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1997
- B.L. v. Iowa District Court for Johnson CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1991
- In Re the Welfare of S.J.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Fette v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.