Legal Opinion
In Re the Welfare of S.A.V.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided August 12, 1986No. C2-85-2240Published
1Opinion of the Court
392 N.W.2d 260 (1986)
In the Matter of the WELFARE OF S.A.V. and S.M.V.
No. C2-85-2240.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota.
August 12, 1986.
Daniel L. Giles, Christianson, Stoneberg, Giles & Myers, Marshall, for appellant L.V.
Cecil E. Naatz, Marshall, for appellant B.V.
Patrick J. Leary, Quarnstrom, Doering, Pederson, Leary & Murphy, Marshall, for Guardian ad Litum.
Kathleen A. Kusz, Asst. Lyon Co. Atty., Marshall, for respondent Region VIII North Welfare.
Heard, Considered, and Decided by FORSBERG, P.J., and SEDGWICK and RANDALL, JJ.
OPINION
SEDGWICK, Judge.
S.A.V. and S.M.V. were adjudicated dependent…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Garrity v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Minnesota v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Lefkowitz v. TurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.