Cricut v. Enough For Everyone
District Court, D. Utah
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CRICUT, INC., a Delaware corporation, MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S Plaintiff, MOTION FOR SANCTIONS AND DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION v. FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SURREPLY ENOUGH FOR EVERYONE, INC., a Nevada corporation, and DESIRÉE TANNER, an individual, Case No. 2:21-CV-00601-TS-DAO Defendants. District Judge Ted Stewart This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Sanctions and Defendants’ Motion for Leave to File Sur-Reply. For the reasons discussed below, the Court will grant Plaintiff’s Motion and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Beaird v. Seagate Technology, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Green v. New Mexico Dept.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Doebele v. Sprint/United Management Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- Erickson v. Newmar Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.