Legal Opinion

Concerned Parents of Stepchildren v. Mitchell

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1982No. 16870PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEWART, Justice:

The basic issue in this case is whether the State of Utah unlawfully terminated benefits for stepchildren paid pursuant to the Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC), a cooperative federal-state welfare-type program administered by the states and funded on a matching fund basis by both the state and federal governments.

The AFDC program was created by Title IV-A of the Social Security Act, 49 Stat. 620, as amended, 42 U.S.C., § 601 et seq. The state statutory provisions providing for the administration of the program are found in Utah Code Ann., 1953, § 55-15a-l et…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. King v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Thorpe v. Housing Authority of DurhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Hall v. BealsSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. New York State Department of Social Services v. DublinoSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Morton International, Inc. v. Auditing Division of the Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Wells v. Children's Aid Soc. of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1984
  3. United States v. Jeffrey Richard PowellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  4. STATE, DEPT. OF SOCIAL SERVICES v. HiggsUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Maryland Commission on Human Relations v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API