Maryland Commission on Human Relations v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtDavidson, J.
This case presents a question concerning the doctrine of exhaustion of statutorily prescribed administrative and judicial remedies. More particularly, the question is whether a party may have recourse to a court without exhausting statutorily prescribed administrative proceedings and judicial review if the principal question presented before the agency concerns the interpretation of an agency rule.
On 12 December 1977, Llewellyn Wakeman (Wakeman) filed a complaint with the petitioner, the Maryland Commission on Human Relations (Commission), alleging that the respondent, Bethlehem Steel…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- United States v. CaceresSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. LarionoffSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- American Farm Lines v. Black Ball Freight ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Purity Supreme, Inc. v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
- Prince George's County v. BlumbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Bd. of Ed. for Dorchester Co. v. HubbardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- Zappone v. Liberty Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
- Maryland Transportation Authority v. KingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- Sugarloaf Citizens Ass'n v. Northeast Maryland Waste Disposal AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
- Board of License Commissioners v. Corridor Wine, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.