Legal Opinion

Commercial National Bank v. Hutchinson Box Board & Paper Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 10, 1916No. 20,235PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Reno district court; Frank F. Prigg, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Marshall, J.:

The plaintiff recovered judgment on a negotiable promissory note. The defendants appeal.

For a statement of the facts in this case and of the questions involved, we quote from the defendants’ brief, as follows:

“On December 30, 1914, the appellee filed its petition against the appellants, declaring on five promissory notes of different dates, executed by *351the defendants. On April 6, 1915, the defendant, The Hutchinson Box Board & Paper Company, which will be hereinafter referred to as the Paper Company, filed its answer and cross petition;…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. McNamara v. CulverSupreme Court of Kansas · 1879
  2. Simpson v. KimberlinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1874
  3. Babcock v. D. Deford & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1875
  4. Weeks v. MedlerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1878
  5. Thisler v. MackeySupreme Court of Kansas · 1902

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bushnell v. ElkinsWyoming Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Rottman v. HevenerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  3. Hills Savings Bank v. HirtSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  4. Underwood v. VilesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
  5. Wilhoit v. SeavallSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API