Legal Opinion

United States Department of Agriculture v. Hunter

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 11, 1949No. 12301PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIBLEY, Circuit Judge.

The decree appealed from is that “The mineral, oil and gas rights reserved to the United States in each of the quitclaim deeds to each of these plaintiffs * * * were unlawfully reserved, and there has *794been a cloud cast upon the title to the respective properties owned by these plaintiffs by virtue of such unlawful and wrongful reservations in each of said quitclaim deeds conveying the title to the respective properties of these plaintiffs. * * * The quitclaim deeds were executed by the United States through the United States Department of Agriculture through the Farm…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Land v. DollarSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Mine Safety Appliances Co. v. ForrestalSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Willing v. Chicago Auditorium Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
  4. Goltra v. WeeksSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  5. Wells v. RoperSupreme Court of the United States · 1918

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Krisel v. DuranDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
  2. Nanopierce Technologies, Inc. v. Depository Trust & Clearing Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Allen v. AllenDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1968
  4. Barnes v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1962
  5. Love v. Royall, Secretary of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1950

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API