Legal Opinion

Mine Safety Appliances Co. v. Forrestal

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 7, 1946No. 71PublishedCited by 120 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Black

After an investigation in which appellant’appeared, appellee James V. Forrestal, while Under Secretary of the Navy, determined that the appellant had received a large amount of excessive profits on government war contracts within the meaning of the Renegotiation Act. Pursuant to the powers given him by that Act the appellee notified appellant that unless appellant took action to eliminate these profits the Under Secretary would direct government disbursing officers to withhold payments due appellant on other contracts, sufficient in amount to offset the government’s loss due to the excessive…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Ex Parte State of New York, No. 1Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. In Re AyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. Minnesota v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. Philadelphia Co. v. StimsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  5. Pennoyer v. McConnaughySupreme Court of the United States · 1891

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by120 opinions

  1. Larson v. Domestic and Foreign Commerce Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Land v. DollarSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Aircraft & Diesel Equipment Corp. v. HirschSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Malone v. BowdoinSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Republic of Philippines v. PimentelSupreme Court of the United States · 2008

115 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API