Legal Opinion
Wells v. Roper
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided March 18, 1918No. 103PublishedCited by 91 opinions
The case is stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Pitney
This was a suit in equity brought in the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia for an injunction to restrain Daniel C. Roper, First Assistant Postmaster General, from annulling a contract theretofore made between plaintiff and the Postmaster General acting for the United States, and from interfering between plaintiff and the United States in the proper performance and execution of the contract by plaintiff. The Supreme Court sustained a motion to dismiss the bill, its decree to that effect was affirmed by the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia (44 App. D. C. 276), and plaintiff…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Philadelphia Co. v. StimsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Noble v. Union River Logging RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- AMERICAN SCHOOL OF MAGNETIC HEALING v. McANNULTYSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Belknap v. SchildSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
3Cited by91 opinions
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Land v. DollarSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Malone v. BowdoinSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. North Dakota Ex Rel. LangerSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Worcester County Trust Co. v. RileySupreme Court of the United States · 1937
86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.