Legal Opinion

Fields v. Blake

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 20, 2004No. Civil Action 03-2150PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND MEMORANDUM

ORDER DUBOIS, District Judge.

AND NOW, this 20th day of December, 2004, upon consideration of Federal Defendants’ 1 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Second Amended and Amended Second Amended Complaint, or in the alternative, for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 41, filed 5/7/04), -pro se plaintiffs Response to Defendants’ Motion of 7 May 04 (Doc. No. 45, filed 5/14/04 filed), and the related submissions of the parties, for the reasons set forth in the attached Memorandum, IT IS ORDERED that Federal Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Second Amended and Amended Second Amended…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Charlot v. Ecolab, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2015
  2. Smith v. City of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Donald Vance v. Donald RumsfeldCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  4. Donald Vance v. Donald RumsfeldCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  5. Pauletta v. DiehlDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API