SS & C Technologies, Inc. v. Providence Investment Management
District Court, D. Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S OPINION
THOMAS P. SMITH, United States Magistrate Judge.
The court has conducted a six-day evi-dentiary hearing on plaintiff SS & C Technologies, Inc.’s (“SS & C”) motion for a preliminary injunction (Dkt. # 44). On the basis of the evidence adduced in great detail, the magistrate concludes that a preliminary injunction should not enter on the present record in this case. Also pending before the court are cross-motions for prejudgment remedies (Dkt. # 44, 66). These motions were also the subject of the evi-dentiary hearing. The magistrate declines to grant either of these…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Jackson Dairy, Inc. v. H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Tucker Anthony Realty Corp. v. SchlesingerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Bell & Howell: Mamiya Co. v. Masel Supply Co. Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Joanne Kamerling v. Larry G. Massanari, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Three S. Development Co. v. SantoreSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Town of Riverhead v. CSC Acquisition—NY, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2009
- United of Omaha Life Insurance v. Connecticut Student Loan FoundationDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2010
- ARMOUR Capital Management LP v. SS&C Technologies, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2019
- Baltas v. BowersDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2024
- Hyde v. Beverly Hills Suites, LLCDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2010