Legal Opinion

Baltas v. Bowers

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided April 26, 2024No. 3:23-cv-00764Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT : JOE BALTAS, : Plaintiff, : : v. : No. 3:23-cv-0764 (VAB) : SHANNON BOWERS, et al, : Defendants. : : ORDER Before the Court are Plaintiff Joe Baltas’s motion for prejudgment remedy, ECF No. 60, and motion to reclaim Plaintiff’s motion for prejudgment remedy, ECF No. 61. Those motions are DENIED. The Court permitted several of Mr. Baltas’s claims to proceed in its Initial Review Order. See ECF No. 12 at 2. The Court denied Mr. Baltas’s previously filed motions seeking a prejudgment remedy in that Order. Id. (citing ECF Nos. 4, 5). The Court…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dietz v. BouldinSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  2. Roberts v. CatonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  3. Rafferty v. Noto Bros. Construction, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  4. Kendall v. AmsterConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
  5. Everspeed Enterprises Ltd. v. Skaarup Shipping Int'lDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API