Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Brookins

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 12, 1991PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Judgment unanimously reversed on the *620law without costs and petition dismissed. Memorandum: The court erred in annulling the Planning Board’s determination. Whether to approve or disapprove petitioners’ subdivision proposal was within the discretion of the Planning Board (Town Law §§ 270, 277; see, Matter of Currier v Planning Bd., 74 AD2d 872, affd 52 NY2d 722). Judicial review of the Planning Board’s determination (see, Town Law § 274-a [3]; CPLR 7803) is limited to the issue of whether it is illegal or arbitrary and capricious (Matter of Heller v Kabcenell, 126 AD2d 728). The reviewing…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Currier v. Planning Board of HuntingtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  2. Matter of Currier v. Planning Bd. of the Town of HuntingtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Heller v. KabcenellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Honess 52 Corp. v. Town of FishkillDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
  2. M & M Partnership v. SweenorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. Cedarwood Land Planning v. Town of SchodackDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1997
  4. Sheer Pleasure Lingerie, Inc. v. Town of Colonie Planning BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  5. Razzano v. Planning Board of the Town of North ElbaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API