Legal Opinion
Cedarwood Land Planning v. Town of Schodack
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided January 31, 1997No. 1:95-cv-01834PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM, DECISION AND ORDER
McAVOY, Chief Judge.
This action focuses upon the circumstances surrounding plaintiff Cedarwood Land Planning’s [“Cedarwood”] attempt to develop a residential subdivision on land it owns in the defendant Town of Schodaek [the “Town”]. Cedarwood alleges that the Town, through the Schodaek Planning Board [the “Planning Board”] and the Schodaek Town Board [the “Town Board”], diminished the value of the land through the zoning, environmental and planning approval processes at issue. Cedarwood claims violations of the state and • federal constitutions, and 42 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Agins v. City of TiburonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Frooks v. Town of CortlandtDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Riley v. Town of BethlehemDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1999
- S&R DEVELOPMENT ESTATES, LLC v. BassDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Deepwells Estates Inc. v. Incorporated Village of Head of the HarborDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1997
- Honess 52 Corp. v. Town of FishkillDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.