State of Arizona v. Ronald James Sisco II
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CHIEF JUSTICE BALES,
opinion of the Court:
¶ 1 Here we consider whether the odor of marijuana suffices to establish probable cause for issuance of a search warrant, given the adoption of the Arizona Medical Marijuana Act (“AMMA”), A.R.S. §§ 36-2801 through 2819. We hold that it does, unless other facts would cause a reasonable person to believe the marijuana use or possession is authorized by AMMA, thereby dispelling the probable cause that otherwise would exist.
I
¶ 2 In March 2013, Tucson police officers responded to a tip that “a strong odor of fresh marijuana” was emanating from a storage…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Texas v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Horton v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Minnesota v. DickersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State of Arizona v. Ian Harvey CheathamArizona Supreme Court · 2016
- O.S. v. O.S.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2018
- State v. ConnerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020
- State v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
- State v. RaffaeleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.