Legal Opinion

State of Arizona v. Ronald James Sisco II

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 2016No. CR-15-0265-PRPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHIEF JUSTICE BALES,

opinion of the Court:

¶ 1 Here we consider whether the odor of marijuana suffices to establish probable cause for issuance of a search warrant, given the adoption of the Arizona Medical Marijuana Act (“AMMA”), A.R.S. §§ 36-2801 through 2819. We hold that it does, unless other facts would cause a reasonable person to believe the marijuana use or possession is authorized by AMMA, thereby dispelling the probable cause that otherwise would exist.

I

¶ 2 In March 2013, Tucson police officers responded to a tip that “a strong odor of fresh marijuana” was emanating from a storage…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Texas v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. United States v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Horton v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Minnesota v. DickersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State of Arizona v. Ian Harvey CheathamArizona Supreme Court · 2016
  2. O.S. v. O.S.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2018
  3. State v. ConnerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020
  4. State v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
  5. State v. RaffaeleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API