Smith v. CITY OF ROCKINGHAM
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBranch, J.
The judgment entered in this cause was a final judgment, entered in equity, and should have been granted only by the judge at the final trial of the action. Hamilton v. Icard, 112 N.C. 589, 17 S.E. 519.
G.S. 160-90 provides: “Power to Adjust Assessment: — The governing body may correct, cancel or remit any assessment for a local improvement, and may remit, cancel or adjust the interest or penalties on any such assessment. The governing body has the power, when in its judgment there is any irregularity, omission, error or lack of jurisdiction in any of the proceedings relating thereto, to set…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pharr v. GaribaldiSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Hamilton v. . IcardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
- City of Winston-Salem v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- Frink v. . StewartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
- Green v. WESTERN AND SOUTHERN LIFE INSURANCE CO.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Coggins v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- County of Johnston v. City of WilsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Shishko v. WhitleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- Knight v. Duke Power Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
- General Electric Co. v. Local 182 International Union of Electrical, Radio & MacHine WorkersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.