Frink v. . Stewart
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Motion to continue an injunction to the hearing, in a cause pending in the Superior Court of Brunswick county, heard by MaoBae, Judge, at Chambers, in Lumberton, on April 14th, 1885., His Honor refused to continue the tiff appealed. injunction, and the plain— The facts appear in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
MereimoN, J:
We think it very plain that the plaintiff is not •entitled to relief by injunction. He alleges simply, repeated trespasses, of slight importance, on a small portion of his land, and it is plain to be seen from the complaint, that they are not such as have done, and that the probable continuance of which, will do him, irreparable injury — indeed, such injury done or •anticipated, is not alleged. It is apparent from the complaint and the affidavits produced in support of the motion for an injunction, that the trespasses complained of, if indeed they are such, are of no great moment,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- John L. Roper Lumber Co. v. WallaceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
- Dunkart v. . RinehartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
- Bell v. . ChadwickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1874
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bond v. . WoolSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
- State v. . FisherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
- Clinton v. . RossSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- Forter v. Armstrong.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
- Purdy v. Manhattan Elevated Railway Co.New York Court of Common Pleas · 1891
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.