Legal Opinion
Schneider v. Republic Supply Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 9, 1926No. 17164PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
FOSTER, 0.
The plaintiffs in error were defendants, and the defendant in error was plaintiff in the trial court, and they will be hereinafter designated as they appeared in that court.
This appeal is prosecuted by the defendants to reverse judgment of the district court of Oklahoma county rendered against them in favor of the plaintiff: upon a promissory note in the sum of $2,719.93. The note was signed by Washita Ranger Oil Company, by its treasurer. J. B. Bohlen, made payable to the plaintiff, the Republic Supply Company.
It was charged in plaintiff’s iDetition that the Washita…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- De Watteville v. SimsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Alfrey v. ColbertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Outcalt v. CollierSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
- In re WellcomeMontana Supreme Court · 1899
- Cox v. Gille Hardware and Iron Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Laws v. FisherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
- Smittle v. EberleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
- Hildebrand v. GrayCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1993
- Butterick Co., Inc. v. MolenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
- Roxoline Petroleum Co. v. CraigSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.