Hildebrand v. Gray
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JONES, Presiding Judge:
Appellant, Mid-Continent Casualty Company [Mid-Continent], seeks reversal of summary judgment rendered against it in a garnishment proceeding by Appellees, Scott Hildebrand and Phyllis Richards. We hold the trial court erred in applying the doctrines of issue preclusion to deprive Appellant of an opportunity to litigate its defenses against the garnishment.
Hildebrand and Richards commenced this action to recover for injuries suffered by them and their minor children when Carl Norman Gray crashed his car into the Richards’s house. The crash occurred at…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Wabaunsee v. HarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- Laws v. FisherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
- Greene v. Circle Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
- Culie v. ArnettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- Ray v. ParamoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- B. Willis, C.P.A., Inc. v. BNSF Railway Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Kinslow v. RatzlaffCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Wilson v. City of TulsaCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2004
- Comanche Indian Tribe Of Oklahoma v. HovisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance v. Carco Rentals, Inc.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.