Hoxsey v. Murray
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Webster, J., entered November 11, 1913, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action for services rendered by a physician.
1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.
The purpose of this action was to recover for professional services as a physician and surgeon rendered to Lyda Murray. The defendants, F. J. Murray and Lyda Murray, are husband and wife. In the bill of particulars annexed to the amended complaint, the account is itemized. Two items of this account are for operations performed upon Mrs. Murray: One operation, described as “curretting,” performed on January 26, 1911, and the other as “laparotomy,” performed on February 16, 1911. The defendants answered the amended complaint by certain admissions and denials, and by a cross-complaint. In the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Armstrong v. Yakima Hotel Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
- Anshutz v. Louisville Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
- Hardman Estate v. McNairWashington Supreme Court · 1910
- Coffer v. EricksonWashington Supreme Court · 1911
- Bousman v. City of StaffordSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Nelson v. West Coast Dairy Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1940
- McCall v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1935
- Patteson v. MyersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938