Legal Opinion

McCall v. Smith

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1935No. 25869. Department OnePublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, J.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover judgment upon a promissory note and to foreclose a real estate mortgage given as security therefor. Defendants’ answer set up a general denial and three, affirmative defenses, two of which were pleaded by way of cross-complaint. Trial by the court resulted in findings of fact and conclusions of law upon which a decree was entered in favor of plaintiff.

On and prior to January 10, 1934, appellants were the owners of certain improved real estate occupied' by them as a home, in the city of Seattle. A mortgage on the property in approximately the sum of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Mallory v. Columbia Mortgage & Trust Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Washington Fire Insurance v. Maple Valley Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Webb v. Southern Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  4. Clemson v. BestWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Coffer v. EricksonWashington Supreme Court · 1911

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Busk v. HoardWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Stansfield v. Douglas CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  3. Strong v. Sunset Copper Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Stansfield v. Douglas CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  5. Easter v. American West FinancialCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API