Kane v. Town of Hudson
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.
In this action the plaintiffs seek damages for diminution in the value of their sand and gravel operation in Hudson caused by the town’s construction of a well and by its taking of 7.13 acres of the plaintiffs’ land to protect the purity of the well. In a previous trial before a judge sitting without a jury, see G. L. c. 79, § 22, as amended by St. 1973, c. 983, § 1, the plaintiffs recovered $71,300, or $10,000 per acre, and the town demanded a trial de novo before a jury. The jury awarded the plaintiffs a total of $8,556. The plaintiffs moved for a new trial, and the judge ruled that he…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Barnes v. City of SpringfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Stewart v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Commonwealth v. SissonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
- Wine v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Attorney General v. StoneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- McSorley v. Town of HancockMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1981
- Young Men's Christian Ass'n v. Sandwich Water DistrictMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
- Portland Natural Gas Transmission System & Maritimes & Northeast Pipeline, L.L.C. v. 19.2 Acres of LandDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2002
- Benevolent & Protective Order v. Lawrence Redevelopment AuthorityMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1992
- Boston Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Retirement BoardMassachusetts Superior Court · 2016