McSorley v. Town of Hancock
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtDreben, J.
The question before us is whether the plaintiff is precluded from recovering damages from the town of Hancock (town) or the Commonwealth in this eminent do main action by reason of a prior judgment against the Commonwealth. We hold that he is not barred. 2
We relate the facts as found by the trial judge and as supplemented by undisputed evidence. The plaintiff is the owner of a dairy farm which was bisected by a taking by the Commonwealth in 1969 to build a relocation of Route 43 in Hancock. Dissatisfied by the award of the Commonwealth (see G. L. c. 79, § 6), the plaintiff brought an action…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Bernier v. Boston Edison Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
- Fowle v. New Haven & Northampton Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
- Massachusetts Turnpike Authority v. Perini Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
- Cochrane v. CochraneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Rudow v. FogelMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Sarvis v. Boston Safe Deposit & Trust Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1999
- Anderson v. Falcon Drilling Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Roche v. RocheMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1986
- Jackson v. RussellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986
- Commonwealth v. BuntingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.