Legal Opinion

Hyland v. Kirkman

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided March 10, 1978PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

157 N.J. Super. 565 (1978)

385 A.2d 284

WILLIAM F. HYLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS,

v.

ELWOOD KIRKMAN ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.

Decided March 10, 1978.

Messrs. Haines, Schulze, Wood & Tapper, attorneys for defendants Kaufman, Kaplan, DeMarco, Dreschler, Saratoga Land Trust, K & D Land Trust, and Cambridge Abstract & Research Co. (Mr. Martin L. Haines appearing).

Messrs. Sills, Beck, Cummis, Radin & Tischman, attorneys for defendants Kirkman and Trimble (Mr. Clive S. Cummis appearing).

Messrs. Kimmelman, Wolff & Samson, attorneys for…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Utah Power & Light Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Driscoll v. Burlington-Bristol Bridge Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
  3. Kugler v. RomainSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
  4. Kugler v. Koscot Interplanetary, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1972
  5. O'Regan v. SchermerhornSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1946

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Hauptmann v. WilentzDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1983
  2. State v. First National Bank of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Federal Trade Commission v. Mylan Laboratories, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2002
  4. Fellerman v. BradleySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  5. Gormley v. LanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API