Legal Opinion
Canyon County v. Syngenta Seeds, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 21, 2008No. 06-35112PublishedCited by 133 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TASHIMA, Circuit Judge:
This case involves an Idaho county’s attempt to recover damages under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-1968, for additional monies it claims to have expended on public health care and law enforcement services for undocumented immigrants. Plaintiff-appellant Canyon County commenced this action against four companies and one individual under RICO’s civil enforcement provision, 18 U.S.C. § 1964(c), alleging that defendants engaged in an illegal scheme of hiring and/or. harboring undocumented immigrant workers within the…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Holmes v. Securities Investor Protection CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Reiter v. Sonotone Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by133 opinions
- Stearns v. Ticketmaster Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Harvinder Singh v. American Honda Finance Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Salmon Spawning & Recovery Alliance v. GutierrezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Just Film, Inc. v. Sam BuonoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- City of New York v. Smokes-Spirits. Com, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
128 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.