Legal Opinion
Powell v. Ray
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided August 28, 2002No. 01-7125PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRORBY, Senior Circuit Judge.
Petitioner-appellant Todd Powell, proceeding pro se, is appealing the denial of his petition for writ of habeas corpus. We previously granted Mr. Powell a certificate of appealability on his claim that the 1997 amendments to Okla. Stat. Ann. tit. 57, § 365, violate the Ex Post Facto Clause. Our jurisdiction arises under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm the denial of Mr. Powell’s habeas petition. 1
Because Mr. Powell is not challenging the validity of his conviction and sentence, but is instead challenging the implementation of the Oklahoma Truth in Sentencing Act, 1997…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Miller v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- California Department of Corrections v. MoralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Montez v. McKinnaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Lynce v. MathisSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Garner v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Boutwell v. KeatingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Gonzalez v. Justices of the Municipal Court of BostonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- Faine v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Powell v. Ray, WardenSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- United States v. PetersenDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.