Legal Opinion

Boutwell v. Keating

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided February 23, 2005No. 03-6278PublishedCited by 188 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TACHA, Chief Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff-Appellant John Kenneth Bout-well was denied placement into Oklahoma’s Pre-Parole Conditional Supervision (“PPCS”) program. Alleging that this denial violated his constitutional rights, Mr. Boutwell seeks to challenge the state of Oklahoma’s actions under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 or alternatively by petitioning for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The District Court dismissed Mr. Bout-well’s action, finding that his claims were not cognizable under § 1988 and that his failure to allege facts sufficient to give rise to a constitutional violation…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  2. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by188 opinions

  1. Palma-Salazar v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
  2. Lymon v. Aramark Corp.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2010
  3. Elwell v. ByersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
  4. United States v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  5. Graham v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2024

183 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API