Boutwell v. Keating
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
TACHA, Chief Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-Appellant John Kenneth Bout-well was denied placement into Oklahoma’s Pre-Parole Conditional Supervision (“PPCS”) program. Alleging that this denial violated his constitutional rights, Mr. Boutwell seeks to challenge the state of Oklahoma’s actions under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 or alternatively by petitioning for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The District Court dismissed Mr. Bout-well’s action, finding that his claims were not cognizable under § 1988 and that his failure to allege facts sufficient to give rise to a constitutional violation…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by188 opinions
- Palma-Salazar v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- Lymon v. Aramark Corp.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2010
- Elwell v. ByersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Graham v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2024
183 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.