Legal Opinion
O'CONNELL v. Weitzman
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 5, 1959No. Civ. 5937PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShepard, J.
This is an action for specific performance which arises out of a dispute over the rights of the lessee under a “first opportunity to purchase” clause contained in a real property lease.
The trial court, after full trial on the merits, found: that January 1, 1953, defendants James W. Harrison and Sylvia L. Harrison, his wife, (hereinafter called Harrisons) as owners, leased certain realty to Helen Glasgow, which realty was a portion of a larger tract owned by Harrisons; that Paragraph Fifteenth of said lease contained the following provision: “If the Lessors should decide to sell this property…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Berniker v. BernikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Buckhantz v. R. G. Hamilton & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1945
- Wilson v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Nelson v. ReisnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Straus v. North Hollywood Hospital, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1957
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Beatty Safway Scaffold, Inc. v. SkrableCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Brookview Condominium Owners' Ass'n v. Heltzer Enterprises-BrookviewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Dalton v. BalumCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
- Brookview Condominium v. Heltzer Enter.-BrookviewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Dalton v. BalumCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.