Legal Opinion

Burns v. City of Chicago

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1929No. 18946. Judgment reversedPublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Elinor Burns, as administratrix, brought action against defendant, the city of Chicago, to recover damages for the wrongful death of her intestate, Robert E. Burns, a minor aged eight years and three months. At the close of plaintiff's case defendant moved for a directed verdict in its favor. The motion was overruled; defendant offered no evidence and renewed the motion, which was again overruled; and the cause was submitted to the jury, which returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $4000. Judgment was entered on the verdict in this amount and on appeal was affirmed by the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Railroad Co. v. StoutSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Union Pacific Railway Co. v. McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. United Zinc & Chemical Co. v. BrittSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. City of Pekin v. McMahonIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Temple v. McComb City Electric Light & Power Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1906

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Kahn v. James Burton Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Wagner v. KeplerIllinois Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Wolczek v. Public Service Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Salt River Valley Water Users' Ass'n v. ComptonArizona Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Skaggs v. JunisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1960

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API