Legal Opinion

Gray v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 1, 1948No. Nos. 46301 and 47897PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMadden, Judge

These two suits are for overtime pay claimed by the plaintiff as an operator of floating equipment while employed by the Panama Canal in its Dredging Division. The first suit covers the period from August 15, 1940, to November 30, 1942, and the second the period from December 1, 1942, to June 30, 1945. The issue in the cases is whether, during *669the period covered by the two suits, the plaintiff continued to be entitled to be paid overtime at the rates fixed by the act of March 28, 1934, 48 Stat. 522, or, on the other hand, was subject to the provisions of a series of wartime overtime pay acts,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Borden Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Posadas v. National City BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. United States v. TownsleySupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Hearne v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1946
  5. Townsley v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1944

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Marr v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1952
  2. Poggas v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1950
  3. Bank of Clearwater v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1985
  4. Kelly v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1951
  5. Moorehead v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1948

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API