Legal Opinion

Hearne v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided December 2, 1946No. 45105PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MADDEN, Judge.

This is a suit by an employee of the Panama Canal, who worked on floating equipment, to recover overtime compensation at the rate of time and one-half for hours of work in excess of 40 hours per week. The claim is based on Section 23 of the Act of March 28, 1934, 48 Stat. 522, 5 U.S.C.A. § 673c.

The plaintiff’s situation is substantially identical with that of Townsley who was given a judgment by this court, Townsley v. United States, 101 Ct.Cl. 237, which was affirmed by the Supreme Court of the United States, United States v. Townsley, 323 U.S. 557, 65 S.Ct. 413, 89 L.Ed. 454.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Norris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. United States v. TownsleySupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Townsley v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1944

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Amell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Gadsden v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1948
  3. Marr v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1952
  4. Poggas v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1950
  5. Baratt v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1978

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API