Legal Opinion

Ameritech Library Services v. Labor Commission

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided September 20, 2007No. 20060870-CAPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McHUGH, Judge:

1 1 Ameritech Library Services and American Manufacturing Mutual/Kemper (collectively Ameritech) petition for review of the Utah Labor Commission's (the Commission) order requiring that they pay 100% of Tamara Edmonds's medical expenses related to treatment of her carpal tunnel syndrome. Ameritech argues that the Appeals Board of the Commission (the Appeals Board) erred when it failed to properly apply Utah Code section 34A-8-110, see Utah Code Ann. § 34A-3-110 (2005), to apportion medical expenses based on the causal contribution of industrial factors to Edmonds's…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Brown & Root Industrial Service v. Industrial Commission of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1997
  2. STATE TAX COM'N v. Industrial Com'n of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Esquivel v. Labor Com'n of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Christensen v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Kennecott Copper Corp. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dale T. Smith & Sons v. Utah Labor CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Dale T. Smith & Sons v. UTAH LABOR COM'NUtah Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Ameritech Library Services (DYNIX) v. Utah Labor CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Ameritech Lib. Servs. v. Utah Labor Com'nUtah Supreme Court · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API