Legal Opinion

Dale T. Smith & Sons v. UTAH LABOR COM'N

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 2009No. 20070848PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

208 P.3d 533 (2009)

2009 UT 19

DALE T. SMITH & SONS and Workers Compensation Fund, Petitioners,

v.

UTAH LABOR COMMISSION and Jeffrey D. Smith, Respondents.

No. 20070848.

Supreme Court of Utah.

April 7, 2009.

Floyd W. Holm, Murray, for petitioners.

Alan L. Hennebold, Salt Lake City, for respondent, Utah Labor Commission.

Phillip B. Shell, Murray, for respondent, Smith.

WILKINS, Justice:

¶1 We are asked, on certiorari, to determine whether the court of appeals correctly construed the term "compensation" in the context of Utah Code section 34A-3-110 of the Utah Occupational Disease Act. We disagree with the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. BurnsUtah Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. SchofieldUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Christensen v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Thomas v. Color Country ManagementUtah Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Kennecott Copper Corp. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Peterson & Simpson v. IHC Health Services, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Ameritech Lib. Servs. v. Utah Labor Com'nUtah Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Auto Owners Insurance v. Labor CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API