Dale T. Smith & Sons v. Utah Labor Commission
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
WILKINS, Justice:
11 We are asked, on certiorari, to determine whether the court of appeals correctly construed the term "compensation" in the context of Utah Code section 84A-3-110 of the Utah Occupational Disease Act. We disagree with the court of appeals' conclusion and reverse. We conclude that for the purpose of section 84A-8-110, "compensation" includes medical expenses.
BACKGROUND
12 Jeffrey D. Smith developed a lower back condition during the course of his more than twenty years of employment as a meat packer. Seeking coverage for this condition under the Utah Occupational Disease Act,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. BurnsUtah Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. SchofieldUtah Supreme Court · 2002
- Christensen v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1982
- Thomas v. Color Country ManagementUtah Supreme Court · 2004
- Kennecott Copper Corp. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Rueda v. Utah Labor Comm'nUtah Supreme Court · 2017
- Dale T. Smith & Sons v. UTAH LABOR COM'NUtah Supreme Court · 2009
- Ameritech Library Services (DYNIX) v. Utah Labor CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 2009
- B.E. v. R.E.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2009
- Auto Owners Insurance v. Labor CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 2026
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.