Legal Opinion

Dale T. Smith & Sons v. Utah Labor Commission

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 2009No. 20070848PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILKINS, Justice:

11 We are asked, on certiorari, to determine whether the court of appeals correctly construed the term "compensation" in the context of Utah Code section 84A-3-110 of the Utah Occupational Disease Act. We disagree with the court of appeals' conclusion and reverse. We conclude that for the purpose of section 84A-8-110, "compensation" includes medical expenses.

BACKGROUND

12 Jeffrey D. Smith developed a lower back condition during the course of his more than twenty years of employment as a meat packer. Seeking coverage for this condition under the Utah Occupational Disease Act,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. BurnsUtah Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. SchofieldUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Christensen v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Thomas v. Color Country ManagementUtah Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Kennecott Copper Corp. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Rueda v. Utah Labor Comm'nUtah Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Dale T. Smith & Sons v. UTAH LABOR COM'NUtah Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Ameritech Library Services (DYNIX) v. Utah Labor CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 2009
  4. B.E. v. R.E.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2009
  5. Auto Owners Insurance v. Labor CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 2026

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API