Legal Opinion

Kennecott Copper Corp. v. Industrial Commission

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 1979No. 15939PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROCKETT, Chief Justice:

Kennecott Copper Corporation seeks reversal of a workmen’s compensation award made to defendant Bill Bilanzich on May 5, 1978, for an injury to and disability of his left wrist which resulted from a fall while in the course of his duties at plaintiff’s workings near Magna four years earlier, in March of 1974.

The defense asserted by Kennecott below and the issue presented on this appeal is that the claim was barred by the three-year statute of limitations contained in Sec. 35-1-99, U.C.A.1953, which in pertinent part provides:. If no claim for compensation is filed with…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. M & K Corp. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Kennecott Copper Corporation v. AndersonUtah Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Askren v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1964
  4. United States Steel Corp. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1972

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Brown & Root Industrial Service v. Industrial Commission of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Grover v. Industrial Com'n of ColoradoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  3. Vigos v. Mountainland Builders, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Christensen v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Stoker v. WORKERS'COMP. FUND OF UTAHUtah Supreme Court · 1994

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API