Legal Opinion
Sagorsky v. Malyon
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 31, 1952PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
.WEINFELD, District Judge.
The papers in the instant case do not support any charge that the “sole,” “primary” or “real” purpose in commencing this action was to use the deposition procedure in the State Court suit. Bachrach v. General Investment Corp., D.C., 31 F.Supp. 84; Empire Liquor Corp. v. Gibson Distilling Co., D.C., 2 F.R.D. 247; DeSeversky v. Republic Aviation Corp., D.C., 2 F.R.D. 183.
The fact that another action is pending in the New York State Supreme Court between the same parties and on the same cause of action does not, in the absence of a showing of bad faith in instituting…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Mottolese v. KaufmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- Bifferato v. States Marine Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1951
- Palensar v. Isthmian S. S. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1951
- De Seversky v. Republic Aviation Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1941
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Brown v. BullockDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961
- In re Penn Central Commercial Paper LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1973
- Schwartz v. Broadcast Music, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1954
- Johnson Foils, Inc. v. Huyck Corp.District Court, N.D. New York · 1973
- United States v. 6.82 Acres of LandDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 1955
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.