Legal Opinion

King v. Lee

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 10, 1971No. 50PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOBBITT, Chief Justice.

The denial by the answering defendants that Albert King, the father of defendant Willie Albert King, owned any interest in Tract #3, and their plea that defendant Willie Albert King is the sole owner thereof in fee, converted the proceeding into an action to try title as in ejectment. 6 Strong, N. C. Index 2d, Partition § 4, at 199 (1968). The burden was on petitioners to show title as alleged, that is, the tenancy in common. Bailey v. Hayman, 218 N.C. 175, 177, 10 S.E. 2d 667, 668 (1940); Jernigan v. Jerigan, 226 N.C. 204, 206, 37 S.E. 2d 493, 494 (1946), and cases…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cone v. West Virginia Pulp & Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Kelly v. International Harvester CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. Mobley v. . GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  4. Cutts v. CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  5. Safeway Stores v. Marvin Fannan, Marvin Fannan v. Safeway StoresCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hensley v. RamseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  2. Whedon v. WhedonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  3. West v. G. D. Reddick, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  4. Lewis v. PiggottCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  5. Campbell v. MayberryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API