Legal Opinion

West v. G. D. Reddick, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 17, 1978No. 7723SC1016PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ERWIN, Judge.

First, we reject defendant’s contention that the trial court acquired no personal jurisdiction over it. A summons containing the alleged infirmity with which we are here confronted was upheld by our Supreme Court in Wiles v. Construction Co., 295 N.C. 81, 243 S.E. 2d 756 (1978). The Court in Wiles overruled a line of authority to the extent that the cases therein were inconsistent with the rule announced by the Court. The Wiles rule was applied by this Court in Public Relations, Inc. v. Enterpries, Inc., 36 N.C. App. 673, 245 S.E. 2d 782 (1978).

We further conclude that the trial…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wiles v. Welparnel Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. Bowen v. Hodge Motor Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  3. Collins v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
  4. Gro-Mar Public Relations, Inc. v. Billy Jack Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  5. King v. LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. West v. G. D. Reddick, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Dodd v. SteeleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  3. Long v. FinkCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  4. Ward v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  5. Gaily v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API