Legal Opinion

Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States v. Berry

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 28, 1989No. H002972PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BRAUER, J. *

This is an appeal from a declaratory judgment that plaintiff Robert L. Berry, a former employee of Fairchild Camera and Instruments Corporation who became totally disabled as a result of “manic-depressive illness,” 1) was not covered under a group disability policy issued to Fairchild by defendant The Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States (Equitable) and 2) has received all benefits due under a group medical/dental policy funded by Fairchild but administered by its agent Equitable.

The group long term disability policy states: “Disabilities Not Covered: Long…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Reserve Insurance Co. v. PisciottaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Madden v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Garcia v. Truck Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  4. McLaughlin v. Connecticut General Life InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1983
  5. Delgado v. Heritage Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Winet v. PriceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  2. Daniel Kunin v. Benefit Trust Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  3. Gordon B. Phillips, as Guardian of James G. Phillips v. Lincoln National Life Insurance Company, an Indiana CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  4. Light v. Allstate InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Bosetti v. United States Life Ins. Co. in City of New YorkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API