Legal Opinion

St. Paul Mercury Insurance v. Frontier Pacific Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 28, 2003No. D037390PublishedCited by 24 opinions

[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McCONNELL, J.

This action involves contribution claims among insurers, arising from the settlement of complaints filed after a fatal crane accident. St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company (St. Paul) insured Bigge Crane and Rigging Company (Bigge) as an additional insured under the liability policy of Schuff Steel Company (Schuff), which rented the crane from Bigge. Additionally, Frontier Pacific Insurance Company (Frontier) and American International Specialty Lines Insurance Company (AISLIC) covered Bigge under primary and excess policies, respectively.

St. Paul persuasively contends the…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Bank of the West v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Denham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Bay Cities Paving & Grading, Inc. v. Lawyers' Mutual InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Maryland Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1998

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Food Safety Net Services v. Eco Safe Systems USA, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
  2. Myers v. Trendwest Resorts, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
  3. Castillo v. BarreraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  4. Mark Tanner Construction, Inc. v. HUB International Insurance ServicesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  5. Raghavan v. Boeing Co.California Court of Appeal · 2005

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API