Legal Opinion
In re the Welfare of A.A.M.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided August 17, 2004No. A03-1793PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MINGE, Judge.
On appeal from an adjudication of delinquency, appellant juvenile argues that there was insufficient evidence to support the adjudication because the state failed to prove lack of consent, as would be understood by a reasonable juvenile. Because there is sufficient evidence in the record to support appellant’s adjudication and because we find no authority requiring the district court to apply a “reasonable juvenile standard” to the element of consent for criminal sexual conduct, we affirm.
FACTS
On May 8, 2003, appellant, the complainant, the complainant’s boyfriend, and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. MerrillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Ramirez v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
- State v. Jason L.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2000
- Michael Alvarado v. R.Q. Hickman, Warden, Acting Warden of Mule Creek State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- In re D.A.R.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. FrelandCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2011