Legal Opinion

State v. Freland

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided May 26, 2011No. 2010AP496PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSherman, J.

¶ 1. Yancy Freland appeals a judgment of conviction for failing to provide sex offender information, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 301.45(2)(e)2m. (2007-08),1 a class H felony, and an order denying his postconviction motion to withdraw his guilty plea to that offense. Freland contends that his plea was not knowing, voluntary or intelligent because he was not aware that the conviction underlying his § 301.45(2)(e)2m. offense, an out-of-state conviction, was eligible for misdemeanor treatment under § 301.45(6). We: (1) interpret § 301.45(6) to provide misdemeanor treatment for out-of-state sexual…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. BangertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Sweet v. BergeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1983
  3. State v. BrownWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Lake City Corp. v. City of MequonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. HamdanWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State of Iowa v. Yancy Dane FrelandCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API