Legal Opinion

Ramirez v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided July 8, 1999No. 89,377PublishedCited by 236 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

739 So.2d 568 (1999)

Nathan Joe RAMIREZ, Appellant,

v.

STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 89,377

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 8, 1999.

Rehearing Denied September 13, 1999.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Robert F. Moeller, Assistant Public Defender, Tenth Judicial Circuit, Bartow, Florida, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Candance M. Sabella, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, Florida, for Appellee.

2Per curiam

We have on appeal the judgment and sentence of the trial court imposing the death penalty upon Nathan Ramirez. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const.…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

3Cases cited87 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1986

82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by236 opinions

  1. Connor v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
  2. Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
  3. Mansfield v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  4. State v. GlatzmayerSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
  5. Doorbal v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2003

231 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API