Legal Opinion

Krumpelman v. Louisville & Jefferson County Metropolitan Sewer District

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided June 20, 1958PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEWART, Judge.

This action was filed as an agreed case under KRS 418.020, and involves the proposed construction of sewers and drains in territory newly annexed to the City of Louisville. The particular area contemplated to be served is a triangular tract across Taylorsville Road from Bowman Field in the southeast section of the city.

Under an Act adopted by the 1946 Legislature (KRS Chapter 76) the Louisville and Jefferson County Metropolitan Sewer District (hereinafter referred to as “Metropolitan”) was created for the purpose of providing adequate sewer and drainage facilities in and around…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Carstens & Earles, Inc. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Gosnell v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1898
  3. Lybass v. Town of Fort MyersSupreme Court of Florida · 1908
  4. Barfield v. GleasonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1901
  5. Veail v. Louisville & Jefferson County Metropolitan Sewer Dist.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1946

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Malakoff v. WashingtonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Conrad v. Lexington-Fayette Urban Cty. Govern.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Wasson v. HogensonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978
  4. Kentucky River Auth. v. City of DanvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1996
  5. Barber v. Commissioner of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API