Kentucky River Auth. v. City of Danville
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EMBERTON, Judge.
The appellants, Kentucky River Authority and its members, appeal from a judgment entered by the Boyle Circuit Court holding that the appellee, City of Danville, received no benefit from the Authority, and therefore, the Authority is. constitutionally precluded from collecting water use fees from Danville.
The controversy in this case arises from the Authority’s interpretation of its enabling statute Ky.Rev.Stat. (KRS) 151.720, which was enacted in response to continuing problems and potential depletion of a valued natural resource, the Kentucky River. In 1990, the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- City of Trenton v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- California v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Armstrong v. CollinsKentucky Supreme Court · 1986
- Long Run Baptist Ass'n v. Louisville & Jefferson County Metropolitan Sewer DistrictCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1989
- Casey v. Richland County CouncilSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re Water Use Permit ApplicationsHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
- HAWAII INSURERS COUNCIL v. LingleHawaii Supreme Court · 2008
- Greater cincinnati/northern Kentucky Apartment Association, Inc. v. Campbell County Fiscal CourtKentucky Supreme Court · 2015
- Commonwealth Education & Humanities Cabinet Department of Education v. GobertCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1998
- CTIA - The Wireless Association v. Kentucky 911 Services BoardDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2024
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.