Legal Opinion
Dunbar v. Orbital Sciences Corp. Group Disability Plan
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided March 18, 2003No. CIV.H-01-2013PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
HARVEY, Senior District Judge.
In this civil action, plaintiff Roscoe Dunbar, Jr. (“Dunbar”) is seeking to recover benefits under his employer’s disability plan which was insured by defendant Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston (“Liberty Life”). Suit has been brought under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001, et. seq. In a claim filed with defendant Liberty Life, plaintiff asserted that he had become totally disabled during the period of his employment with Orbital Sciences Corporation (“Orbital”), and he applied first for…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- McCready v. Standard InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2006
- Cherochak v. Unum Life Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2008
- Hill v. Hartford Life & Accident InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2010
- George Sink PA Injury Lawyers v. George Sink II Law Firm LLCDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2019
- Slachta v. Reliance Standard Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2006