Hill v. Hartford Life & Accident Insurance
District Court, W.D. Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JAMES P. JONES, District Judge.
The plaintiff brings this action under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 1001-1461 (West 2000 & Supp.2010), challenging the decision of Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company (“Hartford”) to terminate her long term disability benefits. For the reasons set forth in this opinion, the matter is remanded.
I
The plaintiff, Geraldine B. Hill, seeks review of Hartford’s decision to terminate her long-term disability (“LTD”) benefits under the provisions of its Group Long Term Disability Plan (“the Plan”). Hartford…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Black & Decker Disability Plan v. NordSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Hebra A. Berry v. Ciba-Geigy CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
- Bernstein v. CapitalCare, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
- Champion v. Black & Decker (U.S.) Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Tortora v. Hartford Life & Accident InsuranceDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2016