Legal Opinion

United States v. Hardage

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Decided February 25, 1987No. CIV-86-1401-WPublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

LEE R. WEST, District Judge.

Plaintiff, United States of America, moves this Court to strike certain affirmative defenses asserted by Defendants J.O.C. Exploration Co., Inc. (“J.O.C.”), DalWorth Industries, Inc. (“Dal-Worth”), Foster Feed & Seed Company (“Foster”), Oklahoma National Stockyards (“Stockyards”) and the Consolidated Defendants, pursuant to Rule 12(f) Fed.R.Civ.P.

On a motion to strike affirmative defenses, the Court must examine each affirmative defense at issue to ascertain whether any question of fact or law is raised by the defense. If a defense raises such a question, then…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Weinberger v. Romero-BarceloSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Porter v. Warner Holding Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1953
  4. United States v. Conservation Chemical Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1985
  5. United States v. Shell Oil Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1985

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. United States v. KramerDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1991
  2. United States v. Marisol, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Federal Sav. and Loan Ins. Corp. v. BurdetteDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1989
  4. United States v. Fairchild Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1991
  5. Kelley v. Thomas Solvent Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1989

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API