Legal Opinion

Estate of Manship v. United States

District Court, M.D. Louisiana

Decided December 8, 2005No. 04-91-C-M2PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RULING AND ORDER

NOLAND, United States Magistrate Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the Motion to Compel Response to Interrogatories, or Alternatively, Motion for Leave to Propound Interrogatories in Excess of Numerical Limit, and Motion for Leave to Propound Requests for Admission in Excess of Numerical Limit (R. Doc. 67) filed on behalf of plaintiffs, the Estate of Douglas L. Man-ship, Deceased (the “Estate”), appearing herein through its duly authorized Independent Co-Executors, David C. Manship, Richard F. Manship, Douglas L. Manship, Jr., and Dina Manship Planche, each also…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Safeco v. RawstronDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1998
  2. Kendall v. Ges Exposition Services, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 1997

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Erfindergemeinschaft UroPep GbR v. Eli Lilly & Co.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2016
  2. Lurensky v. WellinghoffDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
  3. Blackmon v. Bracken Construction Company, Inc.District Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2020
  4. Boggs v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2021
  5. Chouceir v. Hartford Fire Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2025

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API