Legal Opinion
Lurensky v. Wellinghoff
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 16, 2009No. Civil Action No. 2008-1199PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JOHN M. FACCIOLA, United States Magistrate Judge.
This case was referred to me by Judge Kennedy for the purpose of handling all discovery and discovery-related disputes. Before me are several motions: the defendant’s Motion for a Protective Order With Respect to Plaintiffs Request for Production of Documents and for an Order Limiting the Num- her of Rule 3b and Rule 36 Requests That Each Party May Serve [# 19, 20] and the plaintiff’s Motion to Compel the Production of Documents [# 23].
I. Background
Plaintiff Marcia Lurensky brings this action, proceeding pro se, against the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Food Lion, Incorporated v. United Food and Commercial Workers International Union, Afl-Cio-Clc, United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio-ClcCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- Alexander v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1998
- Pleasants v. AllbaughDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
- Jennings v. Family ManagementDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2001
- Glenn v. WilliamsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lurensky v. WellinghoffDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. MansethDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2025
- Eckles v. Archer-Daniels-Midland CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2024
- Toor v. BergerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
- Wedding v. Madisonville Health and Rehabilitation LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2025
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.